Stupid Wall

So they built the wall to be cut through, and then didn't leave money (it is all spent on the barrier) to hire agents to monitor the wall. Really?

"We have a very powerful wall. But no matter how powerful, you can cut through anything, in all fairness. But we have a lot of people watching. You know cutting, cutting is one thing, but it's easily fixed. One of the reasons we did it the way we did it, it's very easily fixed. You put the chunk back in,” Trump said.

This is my favorite part of the BS right here;

“The bollards are not the most evolved design; they are the most evolved that we could pay for,” Ronald Vitiello, former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told the Post. “We never said they would be an end-all, be-all.”

They said that the wall was what was needed, because it was 97% effective. The inference, and the spending of money nowhere else, say's they thought it would be the end all. Which it is not.

Here we are, spent $8 billion on a wall, that they said was impenetrable, but now isn't, and no money for agents to actually catch illegals.

What do we do now? I have an idea, how about we spend some money hiring agents. A wall is a static deterrent, agents are mobile ones. We need more agents, and technology infrastructure. Just sayin, again.